Warning: this piece on Paper.li might end up as a story on a Paper.li daily. I will tweet the link to this blog post, which means that people who follow me and who have set-up a Paper.li daily could have a story in their Paper.li paper about this story about Paper.li.
Cue the microphone feedback sound effect.
I started to see a few @tweric's on Twitter, saying that their "Daily" paper featured a story by me. So, I clicked to check it out. Sure enough, stories I had written, or linked to, were featured in these online newspapers. Next, I had to sign-up at Paper.li myself, and here's what happened.
I set-up my paper to draw from my Twitter account: links from me and those I follow. I was curious to see what an Eric Matas Daily would produce -- I am into technology, elearning, education, gadgets, and social media, so surely my daily would feature stories on those subjects.
Not so much. The top of the page featured a story on a start-up, which I liked. But right next to that was a story that included mention of Michele Bachman. I would hardly ever wish to feature a story about Michele Bachman -- unless it was a story about America deciding not to let her speak into a mic ever again.
As I scrolled down, I saw posts from @HuffingtonPost and @FastCompany, two twitter accounts that I, honestly, forgot I was following. And were they featured because they tweet so many links or because Paper.li knows they are megalithic?
If checking out Paper.li taught me anything, it is that I should monitor who I follow and perhaps stop following people who are linking to stories that I wouldn't want in my Eric Matas Daily.
The more I scrolled down, the more I liked what I saw: more technology stories and education. I wondered if I could change the page layout to feature those at the top. I also wondered if the page layout was "smart," meaning it put at the top the stories that my Twitter account indicated were my main interests. I do follow a lot of news and politics people -- out of social media curiosity -- whereas I follow many elearning people for daily interaction and career interaction.
The paper also generates stories organized by Twitter hash tags. The ones in my paper were certainly from people I follow, and I hardly recognized them. I know when I scan my twitter feed that I key in on my favorite tweeters and other hash tags I might be interested in. Many tweets in my feed are simple glossed over.
I looked into what I could customize, and it wasn't much. But I can't resist change. I changed "The Eric Matas Daily" to "The Tweric Matas Times" for no particular reason other than to connect to my @tweric account more directly. I could have, but didn't, click to automatically tweet the new edition (every morning at 9am). Right on the paper itself, you can add an optional editor's note.
I recommend Paper.li because it is interesting to see what is generated and because it reveals a lot about what your Twitter account is interested in. Maybe you are interested in the same things as your account?
Last thought: my daily is still an experiment, but Guy Kawasaki has one. Maybe if I tweet a link just before his daily is generated...I will raise my chances of being featured on his paper. Is timing of tweets a way to stack the Paper.li deck?
(Technically Kawasaki has several daily papers on Paper.li, which are focused on certain topics that he covers. One way he controls the Holy Kaw Daily is by only following one person from the Holy Kaw twitter account. Oh, and it's not me!)


